Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Leveling the playing field

New York Times/May 18, 2006
Colleges Chase as Cheats Shift to Higher Tech
By JONATHAN D. GLATER

LOS ANGELES — At the University of California at Los Angeles, a student loaded his class notes into a handheld e-mail device and tried to read them during an exam; a classmate turned him in. At the journalism school at San Jose State University, students were caught using spell check on their laptops when part of the exam was designed to test their ability to spell.

And at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, after students photographed test questions with their cellphone cameras, transmitted them to classmates outside the exam room and got the answers back in text messages, the university put in place a new proctoring system.

"If they'd spend as much time studying," said an exasperated Ron Yasbin, dean of the College of Sciences at U.N.L.V., "they'd all be A students."

With their arsenal of electronic gadgets, students these days find it easier to cheat. And so, faced with an array of inventive techniques in recent years, college officials find themselves in a new game of cat and mouse, trying to outwit would-be cheats this exam season with a range of strategies — cutting off Internet access from laptops, demanding the surrender of cellphones before tests or simply requiring that exams be taken the old-fashioned way, with pens and paper.

"It is kind of a hassle," said Ryan M. Dapremont, 21, who just finished his third year at Pepperdine University, and has had to take his exams on paper.

"My handwriting is so bad," he said. "Whenever I find myself having to write in a bluebook, I find my hand cramps up more, and I can't write as quickly."

Mr. Dapremont said technology had made cheating easier, but added that plagiarism in writing papers was probably a bigger problem because students can easily lift other people's writings off the Internet without attributing them.

Still, some students said they thought cheating these days was more a product of the mind-set, not the tools at hand.

"Some people put a premium on where they're going to go in the future, and all they're thinking about is graduate school and the next step," said Lindsay Nicholas, a third-year student at U.C.L.A. She added that pressure to succeed "sometimes clouds everything and makes people do things that they shouldn't do."

In a survey of nearly 62,000 undergraduates on 96 campuses over the past four years, two-thirds of the students admitted to cheating. The survey was conducted by Don McCabe, a Rutgers professor who has studied academic misconduct and helped found the Center for Academic Integrity at Duke.

David Callahan, author of "The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead" (Harcourt, 2004), suggested that students today feel more pressure to do well in order to get into graduate or professional school and secure a job.

"The rational incentives to cheat for college students have grown dramatically, even as the strength of character needed to resist those temptations has weakened somewhat," Mr. Callahan said.

Whatever the reasons for cheating, college officials say the battle against it is wearing them out.

Though Brian Carlisle, associate dean of students at U.C.L.A., said most students did not cheat, he spoke wearily about cases of academic dishonesty.

He told of the student who loaded his notes onto the Sidekick portable e-mail device last fall; students who have sought help from friends with such devices; students who have preprogrammed calculators with formulas. Some students have even deigned to use the traditional cheat sheet, he said.

"One of the things that we're going to be paying close attention to as time goes on is the use of iPods," Professor Carlisle added, pointing out that with a wireless earpiece, these would be hard to detect.

The telltale iPod headphone wire proved the downfall of a Pepperdine student a couple of years ago, after he had dictated his notes into the portable music player and tried to listen to them during an exam.

"I have taught for 30 years and each year something new comes on
the scene," Sonia Sorrell, the professor who caught the student, said in an
e-mail message.

At the Anderson School of Management at U.C.L.A., the building's wireless Internet hotspot is turned off during finals to thwart Internet access.

Richard Craig, a professor at the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at San Jose State, who caught students using spell check
last year, said that for tests, he arranged the classroom desks so that the
students faced away from him but he could see their desktop screens.

"It was just a devilishly simple way to handle it," Professor Craig said.

At the University of Nevada, Professor Yasbin, the dean, was not the only one upset by the camera phone cheating episode there, which occurred in 2003; honest students were appalled, too. They suggested that they police one another, by being exam proctors.

"The students walk around the classroom, and if they see something suspicious, they report it," Professor Yasbin said.

Amanda M. Souza, a third-year undergraduate who heads the proctor
program, said her classmates had decidedly mixed reactions to the student
monitors.

"The ones that aren't cheating think it's a great idea, " she said. "You always see students who are really well prepared covering their papers. But the ones that aren't prepared, probably don't like us."

At Mercer County Community College in West Windsor, N.J., students must clear their calculators' memory and sometimes relinquish their cellphones before tests. At Brigham Young University, exams are given in a testing center, where electronic devices are generally banned.

In some classes at Butler University in Indianapolis, professors use software that allows them to observe the programs running on computers students are taking tests on. And some institutions even install cameras in rooms where tests are administered.

To take a final exam last week, Alyssa Soares, a third-year law student at U.C.L.A., had to switch on software that cut her laptop's Internet access, wireless capability and even the ability to read her own saved files. Her computer, effectively, became a glorified typewriter. Ms. Soares, 28, said she did not mind. "This is making sure everyone is on a level playing field," she said.

Several professors said they tried to write exams on which it was hard to cheat, posing questions that outside resources would not help answer. And at many institutions, officials said that they rely on campus honor codes.

Several professors said the most important thing was to teach students
not to cheat in the first place.

Timothy Dodd, executive director of the Center for Academic Integrity, said creating a "nuclear deterrent" to cheating in class, and perhaps implying that it is acceptable elsewhere, "is antithetical to what we should be doing as educators."

14 Comments:

Blogger Koru's Daughter said...

Here is a positive NYT article on booming journalism schools that might interest you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/15/business/media/15students.html

12:29 AM  
Blogger Unknownprofessor said...

Although they're illegal, I've considered getting a cell phone jammer for my class (about $200). Then just enjoy the befuddlement when their phones just don't seem to work in my class.

7:28 AM  
Blogger mattbg said...

I can't believe that they're having to test spelling ability at University level. I don't think I had spelling tests at all after grade 6 (Canadian experience).

7:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I never understood the purpose of cheating. Then again, I was intellectually arrogant (in a quiet, well-behaved-girl sort of way) and mainly wanted to compete against myself and the other top students. (Hmmm, I always assumed they didn't cheat, either.)

In my major, theology, we had to write tightly-reasoned analyses of various theologies. I suppose we could have copied other students' papers . . . it would have been technically a lot harder back in 1974-78, though. I knew the fraternities kept file cabinets of old exams and papers, but I utterly despised them, and I don't think it did much good anyway. Who'd be stupid enough to crib from some frat idiot's paper? Well, another frat idiot.

I was going to say that the nature of the questions (in my religion classes) would have made it hard to cheat, but now that I think of downloading papers off the internet, I suppose it's just as easy to copy a paper on the American Transcendentalists as it is on any other topic. Depressing.

"Kids -- be arrogant! Intellectual arrogance can be your friend! Find out what you can do UNAIDED!"

Do you suppose that might work as a deterrent to cheating, for at least some kids?

9:35 AM  
Anonymous it's not just education said...

Honestly, in a world where it's becoming the NORM to lie on your resume and get someone already in the industry to pretend to be you and do your interviews for you in order to join consulting companies... to the point where the RECRUITER tells you , "I have your resume, but there's some things we have to change. Don't worry, we'll do it for you" ...

Do you think it really matters anymore?

Eventually the whole system will fall apart and people will once again be judged by what they know, not what they appear to know. But in the meantime, kiss America's place as a superpower goodbye.

10:29 AM  
Blogger daveawayfromhome said...

Cheating has become rampant and even "acceptable" because education has become a commodity. You've got your Rolex, your Lexus, your Vice-Presidency and your Business degree from Prestige U. Or, at least, that's the dream.
For most people now, it's just another thing to acquire, rather than a path to greater growth or understanding. The renaissance is cold and dead, and those who advocate higher tuition for "insufficient progress", or part-timers, or 2nd degree-seekers know that (or killed it, I cant decide).

3:03 PM  
Anonymous Ragman said...

Brookhaven CC does a testing center where you aren't allowed to bring in anything except what the professor allows for the test. They only allow TI-83/86 calculators, which are cleared before you go in.

8:00 PM  
Anonymous B said...

Like the article said, for all the effort and planning that goes into new forms of cheating, they could've just used that creativity and time to study and do just fine.

2:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Integrity is a nice personal quality to have, but not in a Darwinian viper pit that the American job market is turning into. Now, even entry-level jobs in many fields require well-above-average academic record as well as at least a year of relevant work experience. Who can blame the students for adapting and improvising in an environment that is increasingly hostile to young people?

4:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recall one time in college when I had not read the day's assigned reading in a literature class. My professor had a habit of hitting us with pop tests. The tests were three questions long. The way the class was arranged I could see the pper of a student sitting in front, and below, me. I copied the other student's answers.

However, when it came time to hand in our papers, I simply did not do it. The guilt I felt at merely looking at another student's paper prevented me from taking that next step.

Turns out it was a good idea to take the zero points. The other student's answers were nowhere near correct, so if I had turned in the same wrong answers, I would have been in much bigger trouble than I was in overcoming that one bad quiz score.

4:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's interesting is that profs still test on items which can be easily referenced by electronic methods (and easily graded). The two exam class (mid term and final), testing in essay format on applied knowledge, is a pain to grade, but almost impossible to fake. Even cold tests are of only limited value. Really, profs! Get a little more creative.

7:22 PM  
Blogger jesus said...

I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


Margaret

http://powerleveling.info

8:55 PM  
Blogger marry said...

oho good dear !!!! very intersting blog and a good posting !!! you must maintain your blog, its intresting !!! Nice Buddy
________________________________

MLA Research Paper Format

4:53 AM  
Blogger xjd7410@gmail.com said...

christian louboutin shoes
gucci outlet
ray ban outlet
michael kors handbags
oakley sunglasses
toms
nike air max
nike air max
michael kors outlet online sale
nike outlet
nike huarache shoes
christian louboutin outlet
basketball shoes
ghd hair straighteners
michael kors outlet online sale
nike blazers
louis vuitton handbags
coach outlet store online
adidas shoes
oakley sunglasses
jordan 8s
louis vuitton
rolex submariner
louis vuitton
mont blanc pens
christian louboutin shoes
michael kors handbags
christian louboutin sale
christian louboutin outlet
louboutin pas cher
ray ban sunglasses
kobe bryant shoes
adidas ultra boost
timberland outlet
polo ralph lauren outlet
nike outlet store
nfl jerseys wholesale
adidas uk
hollister clothing store
nike air huarache
2016.7.7haungqin

8:58 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home